O V E R V I E W |


Welcome to Matters Theological.

The central purpose of this blog is to serve as distance learning resource for ordinands undertaking Missiology and Pastoral Studies at the Church of Ireland Theological Institute in Dublin, CITI. Occasionally this space will also host personal reflections on a range of theological and ethical issues.

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

How Adults Learn: Models for how learning takes place

In this second post on the theme of adult learning we move from learning styles to think about ways in which we can facilitate adult learning.  Before doing that it might be helpful to highlight some of the main points in the last post. Do you remember them?!!

Some key observations from the previous post

  • Adults learn in a variety of ways because of their varied learning styles.
  • A variety of delivery formats and teaching methods should be used to facilitate the learning process.

Who was my best teacher?

A good place to start when considering how to best facilitate adult learning is to ask oneself the questions ‘Who has been my best teacher?’ And ‘Why?’  Before jotting down some of your thoughts watch this clip of the late Robin Williams in Dead Poets’ Society where he plays an inspirational teacher.



What is involved in learning

How we learn is a question which psychologists have grappled with for many years. No single theory has gained complete acceptance amongst them although all accept the basic premise that learning occurs whenever one adapts new, or modifies existing, behaviour patterns in a way that has some influence on future performance or attitudes. Thus educationalist Alan Rogers describes learning as ‘voluntary change in one’s pattern of thinking, acting and/or feeling.’

What other judgments might we reasonably make about the nature of change? Here are a few possibilities:

  • We might speak of change as something which is reasonably permanent. When we truly learn and imbibe new knowledge we tend not to go back to behaviour or ideas which do not reflect that new knowledge.

  • We might say that change grows out of past experience: and that therefore for an adult whose reservoir of experience is so much greater than a child’s, any behaviour change must occur out of a deeper and more meaningful experience than that of a child

  • Many theorists would suggest that learners need to be active in bringing about the change which happens: Fraser, Watts and Nye emphasise this “active learning principle” claiming that learning improves when people actively participate in the learning process. When learners are passive recipients of the teacher’s knowledge, less is learned and the learning tends to be superficial. Deeper learning is promoted when the learners are directly involved and are encouraged to work themselves with the material being taught.

  • Finally, it might also be said that there are different types of change – change in what we know (cognitive),  in what we feel (affective) and in what we do (behavioural).  Pont also adds psychomotor development- the acquiring of physiological skills required in order to complete a task, for example,  driving a car, as another expression of change.

Implications for the Christian faith

If we agree with definitions of learning which emphasise change - cognitive, affective and behavioural - then we are on exciting ground because we begin to realise that Christian learning is about the transformation of people’s lives.

            Harris and Schwann define learning as being “essentially change due to experience”.   They then go on to distinguish learning as a

(a)                product - which explains the end result or outcome of the learning.

(b)               process - which emphasises what happens during the course of learning and

(c)                function -  which emphasises critical aspects of learning, like motivation.

                       
Learning as product       

The Christian community has always been a community of learning. We are learning all the time - sometimes formally,  sometimes informally.  This reality is rooted in our own history.

·         In Deuteronomy 6: 20-25 teaching is characterised as natural opportunities provoked by a child’s question.
·         In the early church learning was taken very seriously, since knowledge was deemed to be part of identity.  Thus baptism took place after a long period of instruction and teaching. Cyril of Jerusalem produced 23 catechetical lectures for those preparing for baptism in about 347 or 348
·         The ministry of Jesus was itself a ‘teaching ministry.
 
Take a moment to enumerate some of the ways in which Jesus taught?   
What do you think was the over all aim of Jesus teaching? (a) imparting information (b) developing maturity  (c) conversion and (d) pointing to the Kingdom.  Share your thoughts on this theme later with your colleagues.



Practical Implication:

If the church is a teaching church (as the model of learning as product presupposes)  all of our teaching and learning must be related to aims or outcomes. The planning of every session (i.e. sermons, bible studies etc) must begin with the setting out of clear aims.  What sort of outcomes would we like to see from our teaching ministry? 

Learning as Process (Learning Theory)

There is no one unified theory of adult learning, rather over the past century many theories of learning have developed. We are going to look at two of those key theories in this post.
                                        
Constructivism: Internal schema:

One of the most influential models of learning has been constructivism.  As people learn anything they look for ways to organise their thoughts and they form a schema or a mental map of a particular area of knowledge or set of issues.

Bartlett (1932 cited by Cottrell) described a schema as “An active organisation of past reactions, or past experiences”.

Piaget argued that we acquire knowledge by “acting upon the world”, we seek out new experiences and our brains either assimilate new experience into our existing schemas or else we must try to alter our internal models to accommodate the new information. Thus as we go through the day all of our experiences either reinforce or alter what we know, strengthening or undermining our existing schema.

Constructivism argues that learning is an active process of constructing new models of reality or reinforcing old learning.

When new information is encountered there are a number of possibilities. Eg. The new idea simply washes over the learner or it might be distorted to force it into the existing mindset and so be misunderstood. The breakthrough comes when the learner realises that this new information needs a whole new schema. This liberates the mind into a more creative mode but also robs it of the sense of mastery which a robust schema provides.

Fraser et al claim that in Christian learning this need for a dramatic reconstruction of schemata may be experienced with central concepts like God, Christ and the Spirit.  It may also involve other key doctrinal concepts.

Fry et al (1999) suggest that, “Unless schemata are amended, learning will not occur. Learning whether in cognitive, affective, interpersonal or psycho motor domains) involves a process of individual transformation”

A Process Model of Adult Learning:

After the Second World War,  Malcolm Knowles developed what is known as a process model of adult learning. ANDRAGOGYis a term developed by Knowles and means the art and science of helping adults learn based on knowledge we have of how adults function.  The theory is built around the premise that as individuals mature their need and capacity to be self-directing, to utilise their experience in learning, to identify their own readiness to learn and to organise their learning round life problems increases.

Malcolm S Knowles (1980) The Modern Practice of Adult Education:  From Pedagogy to Andragogy.

The essence of this theory is that in adult learning we need to move away from pedagogy to androgogy. This is best explained when we contrast the two emphases.  In a pedagogical approach the learner is dependent and the teacher takes responsibility for the learning process. The learner is believed to bring little to the learning situation. He or she is essentially reliant on expert input. The main teaching technique is thus the transmittal of information. In this style of learning fear of failure is a great motivator and learners learn what they are conditioned to learn to obtain parental and societal approval.  Finally, learning is standardised and progressive because it is aimed at the same age group and every age

In contrast to this, in the androgogical model, the learner is essentially self-directing and the role of the teacher is to encourage and nurture this need to be self-directed. Rather than being seen as being of little account, the learners’ experience accumulated over a lifetime is a great resource both for self and others. Fundamental to the whole approach is the conviction that learners attach greater significance to what they experience than to what they are told. Thus learning takes on a very different shape in this model.

The teacher according to this model is a facilitator who involves the learners in establishing a climate conducive to learning, creating a mechanism for mutual planning, diagnosing needs for learning, formulating objectives, designing learning experiences, conducting those experiences with suitable techniques and experiences and evaluating learning outcomes and re-diagnosing learning needs.
There are many other groups of learning theory- Pont (2003) outlines stimulus-response theories; cognitive theories; a process model; experiential learning.    

Learning as Function (Learning Contexts)
 
Cottrell contends that despite our natural propensities for learning most of us develop cognitive schema which inhibit our learning, generally because of our previous learning experiences.
On the other hand, other experiences motivate us toward curiosity, openness and new learning

Craig (1994) looks at 10 factors which help adults to learn and uses the mnemonic “REVELATION”;

·relevance, (people learn best when they can see the point of what they are doing, perhaps to cope with a real-life situation); What kind of subject matter taught or explored in church would fail the relevance test?
·experience (experience is used to illuminate and earth practice) Kolb’s definition “Learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience”  What experiences might enhance the knowledge of your congregation?
·variety
·enjoyment
·learning skills(people learn best when they are given help with learning skills- mnemonics- planets?
·Acceptance
·Tutoring skills (adults learn best when tutors practice what they preach) enthusiasm
·Individual differences
·Opportunities (people learn best when there are opportunities for practising and so reinforcing what has been learned
·Nurture (people learn best when they are given the chance to nurture and teach others)

 
Exercise: In what ways does the Alpha Course or any other church taught course you are aware of maximise the principles of adult learning?



No comments:

Post a Comment